Skip to content

The Cone Sisters

June 13, 2012

This is the visual advertising for the Cone Collection. This piece of art is recognizable. It is a Matisse – known as either the Large Reclining Nude, or the Pink Nude, in contrast with his Blue Nude. A large reproduction of this painting on the outside of the gallery drew people in. This exhibition provided a rare opportunity for me to see the works of Gauguin, Picasso, Matisse, Renoir and Van Gogh in my hometown. I had stayed in the building which housed Picasso’s studio when I holidayed in Paris and I am not ashamed to admit that I have seen Midnight in Paris more than once. I also recently read The Paris Wife which recounted that same period and place from the perspective of Hemingway’s first wife.

But the exhibition had as its focus the life and times of the Cone Sisters who put together this amazing collection. Gertrude Stein is well known for fostering aspiring writers and artists in Paris at the beginning of the last century. But the Cone Sisters were also tremendously influential, supporting artists through their frequent acquisitions of early works. Here is the story,

“It took a lot of gall – guts – to paint it,” Henri Matisse was known to have said about his once-controversial Fauve-period paintings, “but much more to buy it.” So recalled his grandson, Claude Duthuit, in a November, 2010, interview, a few months before Duthuit’s death.

I love that. It is a great tribute to those who have made great art possible through their attention, encouragement and wealth.

Among those who had the guts were Claribel and Etta Cone, Baltimore sisters who during the early 20th century amassed an extraordinary collection, which included more than 3,000 works, including about 500 by Matisse. In the end, the Cones amassed the largest and most comprehensive private collection of Matisse and struck up an important friendship with the artist.

Works from their renowned collection (which also includes 114 works by Picasso, as well as paintings by van Gogh, Cézanne, Gauguin, Renoir, Pissarro and others) are part of this summer’s major show at the Vancouver Art Gallery, Collecting Matisse and Modern Masters: The Cone Sisters of Baltimore, which opens May 26.

While the art is remarkable, so is the story of these sisters’ lives.

Born to German-Jewish immigrants (the family name was originally Kahn) in 1864 and 1870 respectively, Claribel and Etta Kahn were women ahead of their time: intellectually curious and accomplished (Claribel was a medical doctor), and self-taught but prescient in their collecting habits.

“Some of it was luck and friendship, but as they began their collection and started to move forward, their eyes became better and their selections became better. They certainly, for women collectors in the United States, put together one of the greatest modern collections this country had ever seen at that point,” says Katy Rothkopf, senior curator of European painting and sculpture at the Baltimore Museum of Art, where she is responsible for the Cone collection.

Long before they were buying art, the women held Saturday night gatherings that became well-known among Baltimore’s smart set. Among those who attended were the avant-garde writer Gertrude Stein and her brother Leo, who lived in Baltimore for a time. It’s likely that the Steins derived the idea for their legendary Saturday evening Paris salons from the Cone sisters, according to an essay by Karen Levitov, associate curator at the Jewish Museum in New York, which created the exhibit.

The sisters bought their first works of art in 1898. Their father had died the previous year and their eldest brother gave Etta $300 to spruce up the family home. Instead of spending it on traditional décor, she bought five paintings from the estate sale of the American impressionist Theodore Robinson.

The Cones’ collecting began in earnest a few years later in Europe, where the sisters were able to travel regularly thanks to the stipend they received from their brothers, whose textile empire became a major supplier of denim and other materials to Levi Strauss & Co., and, during the First World War, to the U.S. armed forces.

In Paris, the Steins introduced the Cones to important art – and artists. On Oct. 18, 1905, they attended the Salon d’Automne, an alternative to the conservative official Salon. It was groundbreaking, but also controversial; that year, one critic famously compared the art to the work of wild beasts (fauves) – which led to the moniker Fauvism. The work was shocking and even Leo Stein called Matisse’s Woman with a Hat “a thing brilliant and powerful but the nastiest smear of paint I had ever seen.” A few days later, he bought it.

A few weeks later, Gertrude brought Etta to the rundown studio of Pablo Picasso, then virtually unknown, and Etta bought several drawings. More Picassos would follow, including a portrait of Claribel and – a surprise sent in the mail to Baltimore – a pen and ink self-portrait with the words “Bonjour Mlle. Cone” written across the top.

The following January, they met Matisse, and Etta bought two drawings and shortly thereafter her first Matisse oil painting: the Fauve-period work Yellow Pottery from Provence. By the end of that year-and-a-half stay in Paris, Etta had acquired 28 works.

“I think once they sort of got hooked, a lot of the appeal was because they became friends with many of the artists, particularly with Matisse and to a lesser extent with Picasso,” Rothkopf says. “And I think the other thing that really hooked them was that these were souvenirs from time spent abroad. Most of the collection was put together with works bought out of the country. … I think it was sort of part of being in a place that was more fun and more exciting and more thrilling than life back in Baltimore.”

While the relationship ultimately waned, Stein was an important friend and, for Claribel, perhaps more (a diary entry hints at possible intimacy). Etta typed the manuscript for Stein’s Three Lives, and Stein wrote about the sisters in a word portrait, Two Women: “There were two of them, they were sisters, they were large women, they were rich, they were very different one from the other one.”

(Incidentally, the exhibition The Steins Collect: Matisse, Picasso, and the Parisian Avant-Garde is currently installed at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.)

The art hung in their adjacent apartments in Baltimore. Claribel had amassed such a huge collection that she ultimately moved to a different apartment on another floor. Her art stayed – even after her death.

Claribel collected to the end, literally. She purchased her last painting – Gustave Courbet’s The Shaded Stream at Le Puits-Noir – on September 20, 1929, the day she died.

The following year, Matisse, who was in Philadelphia doing work for the Barnes Foundation, travelled to Baltimore to offer his condolences to Etta, and stayed overnight in her guest room. In the apartments, he was confronted by the reality of the Cone collection and what it could mean for his artistic legacy.

“He was completely amazed by what they had been able to put together,” Rothkopf says. “Up to that point, I think up he thought they were important collectors, there’s no question. But after he saw what they had done, I think he really realized that if he played his cards right, he could have a major presence in a major east coast museum.”

Matisse then began making work with Etta Cone in mind: aware of the collection’s public destiny.

As he created Large Reclining Nude over a six-month period, he photographed its progress, mailing 22 pictures to Etta documenting its various stages. She ultimately bought the work, hanging it in Claribel’s apartment across from the tremendous Blue Nude, which had formerly been in Leo Stein’s collection.

The last Matisse oil that Etta bought was Two Girls, Red and Green Background.

Matisse was right to bet on the Cones: When Etta died in 1949, she bequeathed her collection (which included Claribel’s art) to the Baltimore Museum of Art, along with $400,000 to build a Cone Wing.

Rothkopf believes the Cone sisters were more than simply wealthy patrons for Matisse.

“It wasn’t just a financial thing,” Rothkopf says. “Particularly after having seen what she put together in 1930, he wanted her to have some of his best things and really there’s some beautiful letters back and forth between them that are really quite illuminating. They were both very good for each other. He didn’t take commissions, she didn’t do commissions. … He would make things that I think he knew that she would love.”

The collection highlighted more of the sisters life than is represented here. Claribel graduated as a medical doctor and spent the years spanning WWI in Germany doing research on pathology. Etta spent more time in Paris. They both loved shopping. They also kept in touch through regular correspondance and housed their collection in their joint apartments in Baltimore. The exhibit includes photographs and letters of the sisters and their circle.

The paintings of Matisse and the story that goes along with the collection presents an unusually vivid contrast between the two types (a gross and deliberate simplification) of women that artists associated with and benefitted from. On the one hand, there were the wives, lovers, models and odalisques painted lovingly and with great detail. In the case of Matisse, his incorporation of pattern and texture from Oriental fabrics into the paintings delight the feminine observer. On the other hand, there were the patrons, the Cone Sisters and Gertrude Stein, dressed demurely in long dark wool suits, in the mannish style of the first couple of decades of the last century.

What are we to make of this art, collected by women, composed of exquisite line drawings, abstract paintings and scuptures of the female nude?  We admire their courage and foresight in supporting this art when few others appreciated it. We can look on with tenderness at the pathos of the nude models in some of the more representational pieces. But we have to admit that the relationship of male and female in real life is complex, not so easily reduced to a binary. What do you think?

4 Comments leave one →
  1. June 14, 2012 10:28 am

    I think this is a fabulous post!

    You say, “The exhibit includes photographs and letters of the sisters and their circle.” And are any of the photos the ones referred to in the blurb you reproduce in your post?

    “As he created Large Reclining Nude over a six-month period, he photographed its progress, mailing 22 pictures to Etta documenting its various stages. She ultimately bought the work, hanging it in Claribel’s apartment across from the tremendous Blue Nude, which had formerly been in Leo Stein’s collection.”

    The Cone sisters obviously inspired art (i.e., Gertrude Stein’s “word portrait, Two Women” and “Pablo Picasso’s … pen and ink self-portrait with the words ‘Bonjour Mlle. Cone’ written across the top” and, of course, Henri Matisse’s Large Reclining Nude and also his still, photographic documentary of the birth of this piece). And their own creativity is impressive: their (respective) personalities, the personal and interpersonal relationships they developed in creating their collection(s), their choice of their own apparel ( as they watch men paint women nude.

    There is some irony here. The exhibit “The Steins Collect: Matisse, Picasso, and the Parisian Avant-Garde” is in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. This is Gertrude’s and Leo’s collection, the exhibition of a woman and a man. And yet there’s this fact:

    “Less than 3% of the artists in the Modern Art sections [of the Met] are women, but 83% of the nudes are female.”

    The famous Guerrilla Girls poster illustrates the problem:

    In their funny interview, “Guerrilla Girls Bare All,” one of the anonymous feminist art-industry critics calls herself Gertrude Stein:

  2. June 14, 2012 1:06 pm

    Stein’s taste as a collector (in particular, with reference to the show now at the Met, “The Steins’ Collect”) has come under attack from some quarters, as I mentioned here:

  3. Suzanne McCarthy permalink*
    June 14, 2012 6:03 pm


    Yes, all the pencil sketches for the reclining nude are displayed beside the painting itself. She was clearly a very beautiful woman, and her face was drawn in exquisite detail. The transition into the pink nude is an interesting one. Unfortunately there was a bit of a crowd around the sketches so I did not read the entire text of the explanation posted beside them.

    I can’t find an image of these sketches on the internet but the drawing below in this article gives some idea of the attention he paid to the individuality of his models.

    I think the one is this article was Darricarrere, dancer and musician – she has a very memorable face, But it is not only the connection one makes with the model that is so distinctive in Matisse, but also his attention to furnishings and fabric.

    On women artists, historically we just have records of so few. One of my favourite artists is LeBrun. I love her self portaits especially. I have this print hanging in my dining room.


    Thanks so much for linking back to your insightful post on Gertrude Stein. Regardless of what one thinks of her, she was very important. Who is not controversial? And what strong character does not have aspects of their life that seem to others a little nasty? I have read enough of the fights of the early church fathers recently.

  4. Suzanne McCarthy permalink*
    June 14, 2012 6:24 pm

    Here are photos of the Cone Sisters –

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: